Among 203 included studies assessing both technical and non-technical skills, only 46 tested for a correlation, and 40 of those found a positive correlation¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr3·q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Of 203 included studies, 46 tested the correlation between NTS and TS, and 40 (87%) found a positive correlation. → Gamborg ML 2024
Evidence¶
Gamborg ML 2024¶
Gamborg ML, Salling LB, Rölfing JD, Jensen RD. (2024). Training technical or non-technical skills: an arbitrary distinction? A scoping review. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06419-6
q3 · i? · review · r3
Scoping review of four databases (Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus) following Arksey and O'Malley and PRISMA-ScR; 203 publications included. The review reports that "The correlation between TS and NTS was assessed in 46 of 203 studies, whereof 40 found a positive correlation." No pooled effect size is printed.
"The correlation between TS and NTS was assessed in 46 of 203 studies, whereof 40 found a positive correlation."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- 149 of the included studies assessed both skill sets but did not test for correlation between NTS and TS — related
- Among correlation-testing studies, leadership and decision making (n=14 each) were the most common NTS tested, and surgical performance (n=27) the most common TS correlated with NTS — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Most included studies were intervention studies (87%, n=176), including 41 randomized controlled trials — related
- OSATS was the most frequently used technical-skills assessment tool, but many OSATS variations were used without validity evidence — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.