The quality of the coach-athlete relationship as defined by the 4Cs is instrumental to performance success and wellbeing¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Qualitative studies of coach-athlete relationships indicate that relationship quality operationalised by the 4Cs is instrumental to performance success and wellbeing. → Jowett 2017
Evidence¶
Jowett 2017¶
Jowett, S. (2017). Coaching Effectiveness: The Coach-Athlete Relationship at its Heart. Current Opinion in Psychology, 16, 154-158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.05.006
q2 · i? · review · r2
The review reports a series of qualitative studies exploring the content and functions of relationships that were successful and less so, with the overall finding that 4Cs-defined relationship quality is instrumental to performance success and wellbeing. As a narrative synthesis of qualitative work, no effect sizes are printed.
"There have been a series of qualitative studies exploring the content and functions of relationships that were successful and less so [20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25]. Overall, the findings highlight that the quality of the coach-athlete relationship as defined and operationalised by the 4Cs is instrumental to performance success and wellbeing."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Good quality coach-athlete relationships are associated with satisfaction with performance, personal treatment and training, higher motivation and physical self-concept, and greater team cohesion and collective efficacy — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Coach-athlete relationship and coach leadership or behaviours considered together are better predictors of athletes' and coaches' outcomes than either alone — related
- Athletes' personality affects coaches' perceptions of relationship quality, with more difficult personalities linked to lower closeness, commitment and complementarity — related
- Same-gender coach-athlete dyads perceive higher relationship quality (closeness, commitment, complementarity) than other-gender dyads — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
4cs-quality-instrumental-performance-wellbeing |
title |
The quality of the coach-athlete relationship as defined by the 4Cs is instrumental to performance success and wellbeing |
description |
The quality of the coach-athlete relationship as defined by the 4Cs is instrumental to performance success and wellbeing |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2017 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — jowett-2017 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.