The 5E and traditional groups were statistically equivalent in achievement and interest before treatment¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Pretest achievement did not differ significantly between the 5E group (M = 7.52) and the control group (M = 7.76), t(170) = .64, p > 0.05. → Stephen Akinyemi Omotayo & Joshua Oluwatoyin Adeleke 2017 q2 i? Pretest interest did not differ significantly between the 5E group (M = 44.06) and the control group (M = 43.33), t(170) = .51, p > 0.05. → Stephen Akinyemi Omotayo & Joshua Oluwatoyin Adeleke 2017 (2)

Evidence¶

Stephen Akinyemi Omotayo & Joshua Oluwatoyin Adeleke 2017¶

Stephen Akinyemi Omotayo & Joshua Oluwatoyin Adeleke. (2017). The 5E Instructional Model: A Constructivist Approach for Enhancing Students' Learning Outcomes in Mathematics. JISTE, Vol. 21, No. 2, 2017. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1176946

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Pretest comparison in the same quasi-experiment, one week before treatment began. The independent t-test found "no significant difference" between groups on the Mathematics Achievement Test; equivalence was not formally tested beyond this non-significant result.

"there was no significant difference between the mean achievement scores of students in the 5E instructional group (M = 7.52, SD = 2.29) and those in the control group (M= 7.76, SD = 2.64), t(170) = .64, p > 0.05."

Stephen Akinyemi Omotayo & Joshua Oluwatoyin Adeleke 2017 (2)¶

Stephen Akinyemi Omotayo & Joshua Oluwatoyin Adeleke. (2017). The 5E Instructional Model: A Constructivist Approach for Enhancing Students' Learning Outcomes in Mathematics. JISTE, Vol. 21, No. 2, 2017. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1176946

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Pretest interest comparison on the Mathematics Interest Inventory in the same study. The t-test found "no significant difference" between groups before treatment; no effect size is printed.

"there was no significant difference between the mean interest scores of students in the 5E group (M = 44.06, SD = 9.28) and those in the traditional instruction (control) group (M = 43.33, SD = 9.43), t(170) = .51 p > 0.05."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• The 5E instructional model produced significantly higher posttest interest in mathematics than traditional instruction — related
• The 5E instructional model produced significantly higher posttest mathematics achievement than traditional instruction in a Nigerian quasi-experiment — related
• Experimental and control groups did not differ significantly in pre-test science achievement before the intervention — related
• The music and non-music groups did not differ significantly on the mathematics achievement pretest — related