The 5P model produced better mood (alertness, calmness, contentedness) than the 5E model, but with the smallest effect of the three outcomes¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i2 Instructional model significantly influenced mood, explaining 9.8 percent of variance, with significant interaction for alertness, calmness, and contentedness. → Srikoon et al. 2017

Evidence¶

Srikoon et al. 2017¶

Srikoon, S., Bunterm, T., Nethanomsak, T., & Ngang, T. K. (2017). A comparative study of the effects of the neurocognitive-based model and the conventional model on learner attention, working memory and mood. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 14(1), 83-110. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1150726

q3 · i2 · causal · r2

MANOVA multivariate test of mood (alertness, calmness, contentedness via the 16-item Bond-Ladder visual analogue scale) in the randomized Grade 9 study. The article reports the effect explained "the variance of 9.8 percent of mood" (partial eta-squared = 0.098).

"The instruction models significantly influenced mood at a 0.05 significance level (F(3,72)= 2.620, p=0.047) and can explain the variance of 9.8 percent of mood"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• The neurocognitive-based model (5P) produced significantly better attention accuracy than the conventional model (5E) in Grade 9 students — related
• The 5P model produced significantly faster attention reaction times than the 5E model, with a large model-by-time interaction — related
• The 5P model produced significantly better working memory accuracy than the 5E model, with a large model-by-time interaction — related
• The 5P model produced significantly faster working memory reaction times than the 5E model — related