Teacher-judged science ability repeatedly predicts gain in understanding, while age does not and gender effects are weak and non-replicable¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? In a multivariate model of gender, age, ability and SoW, higher teacher-judged science ability predicted greater improvement in both tranches, while age was not significant and gender effects were weak and non-replicable. → Buchan 2020
Evidence¶
Buchan 2020¶
Buchan, L., Hejmadi, M., Abrahams, L. & Hurst, L. D. (2020). A RCT for assessment of active human-centred learning finds teacher-centric non-human teaching of evolution optimal. npj Science of Learning 5:19. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-020-00078-0
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Multivariate model exploring gender, age, ability and SoW across both tranches, accounting for "7.10 –8.30% of the total variance" in student score. Higher teacher-judged ability predicted greater gains; age was not significant and gender effects did not replicate.
"Results indicate that age was not a signi ficant variable but students with higher science ability (as judged by their teachers) improved more. The results also showed weak and non-replicable gender effects which supports the conclusion of the National Pupil Database22."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The four schemes of work showed replicable significant heterogeneity in effectiveness, with the predicted-least-effective teacher-centred/non-human scheme among the most effective — related
- The evolution teaching interventions significantly improved student understanding with effect sizes above the 0.40 implementation threshold in both tranches — related
- Serially taught lesson combinations produce replicable positive interaction effects, with the two most effective schemes showing positive interaction terms — related
- The mutualism model's coupling structure held equally across sexes and age did not directly predict change scores — related
- Children with lower pre-test executive function and social cognition skills improve more, while attendance, teacher involvement, age and school year do not predict gains — related
- Most teacher-level predictors of student performance failed to replicate between tranches, but improved teacher confidence in teaching evolution was a replicable predictor — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
ability-predicts-gain-age-gender-do-not |
title |
Teacher-judged science ability repeatedly predicts gain in understanding, while age does not and gender effects are weak and non-replicable |
description |
Teacher-judged science ability repeatedly predicts gain in understanding, while age does not and gender effects are weak and non-replicable |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2020 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — buchan-2020 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.