Academic status shows a significant overall association with classification accuracy, but sex does not; individual status contrasts are exploratory¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associational r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2029: tool and model accuracy changes quickly

Subclaims¶

q3 i? Academic status had a significant overall association with classification accuracy, Wald χ²(3) = 13.24, p = .004, though the sophomore-versus-senior contrast did not survive Bonferroni adjustment. → Reed 2026 q3 i? Sex was not significantly associated with classification accuracy, Wald χ²(1) = 0.65, p = .420. → Reed 2026 (2)

Evidence¶

Reed 2026¶

Reed, J. M., Ferdig, R. E., Dodson, T. M., Gunstad, J., & Hughes, J. W. (2026). AI Literacy and Scenario-based Ethical Judgment About Generative AI Among Undergraduate Students. Journal of Academic Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-026-09757-w

q3 · i? · associational · r2

Omnibus academic-status effect from the RQ3 binomial model. The sophomore contrast (OR = 0.62, unadjusted p = .045) did not remain significant after Bonferroni adjustment (adjusted p = .135), so the authors interpret individual contrasts as exploratory.

"Academic status had a significant overall association with classification accuracy, Wald χ²(3) = 13.24, p = .004."

Reed 2026 (2)¶

Reed, J. M., Ferdig, R. E., Dodson, T. M., Gunstad, J., & Hughes, J. W. (2026). AI Literacy and Scenario-based Ethical Judgment About Generative AI Among Undergraduate Students. Journal of Academic Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-026-09757-w

q3 · i? · associational · r2

Null sex effect from the same RQ3 binomial model; males had comparable modeled odds to females (OR = 0.88, 95% CI [0.64, 1.21]). No effect size was printed, so impact is null.

"Sex was not significantly associated with classification accuracy, Wald χ²(1) = 0.65, p = .420."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Preferred instruction type shifted by year: Prep School, freshman and sophomore students preferred implicit instruction while junior and senior students preferred meaning-focused instruction — related
• AI literacy shows a small positive association with ethical scenario classification accuracy — related
• Each additional correct GLAT response is associated with a 13.9% increase in modeled odds of correctly classifying a scenario — related