Claims

Psychological well-being of accelerated high-potential participants was above national probability-sample averages at age 50

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? In both studies, participants scored above average on Psychological Flourishing, Positive Affect, and Life Satisfaction relative to normative benchmarks, and about average on Core Self-Evaluations. → Bernstein Brian O. 2021

Evidence

Bernstein Brian O. 2021

Bernstein Brian O., Lubinski David, Benbow Camilla P. (2021). Academic Acceleration in Gifted Youth and Fruitless Concerns Regarding Psychological Well-Being: A 35-Year Longitudinal Study. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000500

q3 · i? · associational · r2

Norm-referenced appraisal of Study 1 box-and-whisker plots (Appendix A); the article reports the parallel result for Study 2 (Appendix B). Participants were "above average on Psychological Flourishing, Positive Affect, and Life Satisfaction"; no effect sizes are printed, so impact is unquantified.

"Benchmarked against normative standards (Diener et al., 1985; Diener et al., 2010; Judge et al., 2003; Pavot & Diener, 1993), the typical participant in Study 1 scored about the average on the Core Self-Evaluations scale, and above average on Psychological Flourishing, Positive Affect, and Life Satisfaction."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id accelerated-youth-wellbeing-above-norms
title Psychological well-being of accelerated high-potential participants was above national probability-sample averages at age 50
description Psychological well-being of accelerated high-potential participants was above national probability-sample averages at age 50
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2021
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-24
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — bernstein-brian-o-2021

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.