Spelling production and recognition accuracy both increase as representational explicitness increases from E1A to E3¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2006 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? One-way ANOVAs were significant for both words spelled correctly and words recognized correctly across representational levels E1A to E3. → Critten 2006

Evidence¶

Critten 2006¶

Critten, S., Pine, K., & Steffler, D. (2006). Spelling Development in Young Children: A Case of Representational-Redescription? Manuscript submitted for publication (Date of Submission: Thursday 3rd August 2006). https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.1.207

q2 · i? · associational · r1

One-way ANOVAs across the four occupied representational levels (E1A-E3) in the 51-child sample were significant for both production and recognition accuracy; Scheffé tests located production differences between E1A and E1B and between E2 and E3.

"One-way ANOVAs were significant for both the mean number of words spelled correctly (F (3, 47) = 18.36 p < .05) and the mean number of words recognized correctly (F (3, 47)= 11.12 p < .05)"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Children recognize correct spellings better than they can produce them, supporting multiple representations in spelling — related
• Spelling accuracy increases across Nunes et al. stages, with main steps from stage 1 to 2 and stage 3 to 5 — related
• Some children show multiple co-existing representational levels and within-domain inconsistency in applying the -ed rule — related
• Children's spelling justifications can be coded into RR-model representational levels, with E1 splitting into phonological (E1A) and morphological (E1B) sub-levels — related
• Nunes et al. spelling stages map onto RR representational levels: stage 2 with E1A, stage 3 with E1B, and stages 4-5 with E2 and E3 — related