Claims

When making accurate judgments, teachers used diagnostic cues to a greater extent, but also used non-diagnostic cues (IQ and reading self-concept)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? When making accurate judgments, teachers used diagnostic cues to a greater extent than when making inaccurate judgments, yet also used two non-diagnostic cues: students' IQ and self-concept regarding reading comprehension. → van de Pol 2024

Evidence

van de Pol 2024

van de Pol, J., & Oudman, S. (2024). Teachers' judgment accuracy of students' monitoring skills: a conceptual and methodological framework and explorative study. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-023-09349-8

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Explorative study of 46 secondary teachers judging 406 students; the article reports that accurate judgments involved greater use of diagnostic cues, but also use of the non-diagnostic cues students' IQ and reading self-concept. No effect size is printed in the supplied text.

"When making accurate judgments, teachers used diagnostic cues to a greater extent than when making inaccurate judgments. Yet, when making accurate judgments, teachers also used two non-diagnostic cues (students' IQ and self-concept regarding reading comprehension)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id accurate-judgments-greater-diagnostic-cue-use-plus-nondiagnostic
title When making accurate judgments, teachers used diagnostic cues to a greater extent, but also used non-diagnostic cues (IQ and reading self-concept)
description When making accurate judgments, teachers used diagnostic cues to a greater extent, but also used non-diagnostic cues (IQ and reading self-concept)
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2024
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — van-de-pol-2024

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.