When making accurate judgments, teachers used diagnostic cues to a greater extent, but also used non-diagnostic cues (IQ and reading self-concept)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? When making accurate judgments, teachers used diagnostic cues to a greater extent than when making inaccurate judgments, yet also used two non-diagnostic cues: students' IQ and self-concept regarding reading comprehension. → van de Pol 2024
Evidence¶
van de Pol 2024¶
van de Pol, J., & Oudman, S. (2024). Teachers' judgment accuracy of students' monitoring skills: a conceptual and methodological framework and explorative study. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-023-09349-8
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Explorative study of 46 secondary teachers judging 406 students; the article reports that accurate judgments involved greater use of diagnostic cues, but also use of the non-diagnostic cues students' IQ and reading self-concept. No effect size is printed in the supplied text.
"When making accurate judgments, teachers used diagnostic cues to a greater extent than when making inaccurate judgments. Yet, when making accurate judgments, teachers also used two non-diagnostic cues (students' IQ and self-concept regarding reading comprehension)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The cue-diagnosticity intervention steered cue utilization: diagnostic cue use increased and non-diagnostic cue use decreased
- Teachers judging student performance mostly use performance cues and, to a lesser extent, student cues
- Performance cues were found most diagnostic for students' reading comprehension performance — related
- Teachers judge more accurately with only diagnostic cues than with a mix of diagnostic and non-diagnostic cues — related
- Teachers' judgments of students' text comprehension are significantly more accurate when diagnostic performance cues are available than when only non-diagnostic student cues are available — related
- Students tend to rely on non-diagnostic cues when judging their own performance, resulting in inaccurate judgments — related
- Teachers often rely on informal impressions rather than systematic, theory-grounded diagnostic procedures when judging students' SRL — related
- Accurately judging cue manifestations, not merely using diagnostic cues, improves teachers' monitoring accuracy; non-diagnostic student cues hamper it — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
accurate-judgments-greater-diagnostic-cue-use-plus-nondiagnostic |
title |
When making accurate judgments, teachers used diagnostic cues to a greater extent, but also used non-diagnostic cues (IQ and reading self-concept) |
description |
When making accurate judgments, teachers used diagnostic cues to a greater extent, but also used non-diagnostic cues (IQ and reading self-concept) |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2024 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — van-de-pol-2024 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.