The ACE-HE measurement model of institutional support for ABC engagement also fits the data well¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? A confirmatory factor analysis of the institutional support model (three affective, three behavioral, two cognitive support elements) met all fit cutoffs (CFI 0.963, TLI 0.957, RMSEA 0.048, SRMR 0.027). → Graham 2023
Evidence¶
Graham 2023¶
Graham, C., Borup, J., Tuiloma, S., Martínez Arias, A., Parra Caicedo, D., Larson, R. (2023). Institutional support for Academic Engagement in online and blended learning environments: Exploring affective, behavioral, and cognitive dimensions. Online Learning, 27(3), 4-40. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i3.4001
q3 · i? · the article prints no effect size for this finding · associational · r2
CFA on the same survey (n = 1253) tested the institutional support measurement model built from the ACE framework's support elements. Table 7 reports CFI 0.963, TLI 0.957, RMSEA 0.048, SRMR 0.027; all standardized loadings were significant and greater than .9.
"We then ran the CFA for the model, and it met the cutoffs for all of the fit statistics as can be seen in Table 7. As with RQ1, this model meets the fit statistics cutoffs, and the model was theoretically derived."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The ACE-HE measurement model of affective, behavioral, and cognitive engagement fits online/blended survey data well — related
- Only support for affective engagement predicts its matching engagement dimension; behavioral and cognitive support do not, contradicting the ACE framework's alignment — related
- Overall institutional support for academic engagement has an extremely strong positive relationship with overall academic engagement — related
- The three-dimension instructional design competence model fits the empirical data acceptably in CFA — related
- Both scales showed acceptable-to-good confirmatory factor fit in this sample — related
- Confirmatory factor analysis on FICSMath data confirms the 4C/ID Model's four components fit secondary-tertiary mathematics instructional experiences (CFI = 0.907, RMSEA = 0.050) — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
ace-he-institutional-support-model-good-fit |
title |
The ACE-HE measurement model of institutional support for ABC engagement also fits the data well |
description |
The ACE-HE measurement model of institutional support for ABC engagement also fits the data well |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2023 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-26 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — graham-2023 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.