Claims

Active listening was the most common individual student communicative activity in the analysed lesson, with marked individual differences between the three students

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2029: local conditions change quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Across coded 20-second intervals for three students, active listening dominated, and students differed in time spent next to the whiteboard, in questions asked, and in active listening. → Lehesvuori 2026

Evidence

Lehesvuori 2026

Lehesvuori, S., Järvinen, M., Lämsä, J., Heilala, V., Hämäläinen, R. (2026). Exploring interconnections between communicative activities, situational stress reactions and cognitive engagement in undergraduate mathematics lesson. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-026-09786-3

q2 · i? · qualitative · r2

Histogram coding (Fig. 2) of individual student activities (coded 20 s per student across the lesson) showed active listening most common; the article also reports "Student A’s questions (in total 16 questions)" and distinct time of Students B and C next to the whiteboard.

"Individual student communicative activities revealed that active listening was the most common activity."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id active-listening-most-common-student-activity
title Active listening was the most common individual student communicative activity in the analysed lesson, with marked individual differences between the three students
description Active listening was the most common individual student communicative activity in the analysed lesson, with marked individual differences between the three students
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2026
recheck_by 2029
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — lehesvuori-2026

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.