Students' own cognitive and metacognitive activities predict learning, off-task activity lowers metacognitive knowledge, and group mates' relational activities raise domain knowledge¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2011 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? A 10% increase above the mean in own cognitive activities predicted 6.35 points higher domain knowledge; group mates' relational activities predicted 6.67 points higher. → Molenaar 2011
q3 i? A 10% increase in own off-task behaviors predicted 4.31 points lower metacognitive knowledge. → Molenaar 2011 (2)
Evidence¶
Molenaar 2011¶
Molenaar, I., Chiu, M. M., Sleegers, P., & van Boxtel, C. (2011). Scaffolding of small groups' metacognitive activities with an avatar. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6, 601-624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-011-9130-z
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Multilevel Model 2 for domain knowledge (N=54): % my cognitive activities coefficient 63.53 (26.06)* and % group mates' relational activities 66.76 (28.04)*, both significant; unstandardized coefficients only, impact null.
"students whose proportion of cognitive activities exceeded its mean by 10% averaged 6.35 points higher on the post-test"
Molenaar 2011 (2)¶
Molenaar, I., Chiu, M. M., Sleegers, P., & van Boxtel, C. (2011). Scaffolding of small groups' metacognitive activities with an avatar. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6, 601-624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-011-9130-z
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Multilevel Model 2 for metacognitive knowledge (N=54): % my off-task activities coefficient -43.05 (13.01)**, significant; unstandardized coefficient only, impact null.
"students whose proportion of off-task behaviors exceeded its mean by 10% averaged 4.31 points lower on the metacognitive knowledge test"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Metacognitive activities mediate the effects of metacognitive scaffolds on both domain and metacognitive knowledge — related
- Both structuring and problematizing avatar scaffolds raise elementary students' metacognitive knowledge relative to no scaffolding — related
- Metacognitive prompts improve learning — related
- Prior Knowledge Needed For Accurate Self Assessment — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
activity-type-proportions-predict-learning-outcomes |
title |
Students' own cognitive and metacognitive activities predict learning, off-task activity lowers metacognitive knowledge, and group mates' relational activities raise domain knowledge |
description |
Students' own cognitive and metacognitive activities predict learning, off-task activity lowers metacognitive knowledge, and group mates' relational activities raise domain knowledge |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2011 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — molenaar-2011, molenaar-2011-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.