Claims

Acute physical activity improves language performance overall (g = 0.28 multivariate), driven by reading, with no significant effect on spelling or sentence comprehension

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · quant-synthesis r3 · q3 · i1–i2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i1 Three studies showed acute physical activity favored an increase in language performance (univariate g = 0.21; multivariate g = 0.28). → Muntaner-Mas A 2024 q3 i2 Reading performance increased significantly (g = 0.41), but spelling (g = 0.08) and sentence comprehension (g = -0.09) did not; reading lost significance in the multivariate model. → Muntaner-Mas A 2024 (2)

Evidence

Muntaner-Mas A 2024

Muntaner-Mas A, Morales JS, Martínez-de-Quel Ó, Lubans DR, García-Hermoso A. (2024). Acute effect of physical activity on academic outcomes in school-aged youth: A systematic review and multivariate meta-analysis. Scand J Med Sci Sports. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.14479

q3 · i1 · quant-synthesis · r3

Univariate and multivariate meta-analysis of three studies assessing language via WRAT-3 and WRAT-4. Both pooled estimates were significant, with the multivariate estimate "Hedge's g = 0.28, 95% CI, 0.09-0.47".

"Acute physical activity favored an increase in this domain (univariate: Hedge's g = 0.21, 95% CI, 0.04-0.38, p = 0.020, I 2 = 0%; multivariate: Hedge's g = 0.28, 95% CI, 0.09-0.47, p = 0.004, I 2 = 47.87%)"

Muntaner-Mas A 2024 (2)

Muntaner-Mas A, Morales JS, Martínez-de-Quel Ó, Lubans DR, García-Hermoso A. (2024). Acute effect of physical activity on academic outcomes in school-aged youth: A systematic review and multivariate meta-analysis. Scand J Med Sci Sports. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.14479

q3 · i2 · quant-synthesis · r3

Sub-group univariate meta-analysis of language sub-domains. Reading showed a significant increase (g = 0.41), while sentence comprehension and spelling did not. The article reports that in the multivariate model significance disappears in reading (g = 0.34, p = 0.161).

"a significant increase was observed in reading performance (Hedge's g = 0.41, 95% CI, 0.07-0.76, p = 0.018, I 2 = 0%), but not in sentence comprehension (Hedge's g = -0.09, 95% CI, -0.90 to 0.71, p = 0.821, I 2 = 0%), and spelling performance (Hedge's g = 0.08, 95% CI, -0.25 to 0.41, p = 0.604, I 2 = 0%)"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.