Reflection increased in the adaptable and non-adaptable script conditions, but only the adaptable script had positive effects on monitoring, supporting overall positive effects on self-regulation¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · reviewr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 2 of 2 entries) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Reflection increased in both the adaptable and non-adaptable script conditions; only the adaptable script had positive effects on monitoring. → Ludvigsen 2017
q2 i? Wang et al. conclude that overall, adaptable collaborative scripts have a positive effect on self-regulation skills. → Ludvigsen 2017 (2)
Evidence¶
Ludvigsen 2017¶
Ludvigsen, S., Law, N., Rosé, C. P., & Stahl, G. (2017). Frameworks for mass collaboration, adaptable scripts, complex systems theory, and collaborative writing. Intern. J. Comput.-Support. Collab. Learn, 12, 127–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-017-9257-7
q2 · i? · review · r2
Reported by the editorial for Wang et al.'s experimental study with university students in educational science, comparing adaptable scripts, non-adaptable scripts, and non-scripted collaboration. No effect size is printed for the monitoring difference.
"Planning is seen as one important aspect of self-regulation. However, reflection increases both in the adaptable and non-adaptable script conditions. Only the adaptable script had positive effects on monitoring."
Ludvigsen 2017 (2)¶
Ludvigsen, S., Law, N., Rosé, C. P., & Stahl, G. (2017). Frameworks for mass collaboration, adaptable scripts, complex systems theory, and collaborative writing. Intern. J. Comput.-Support. Collab. Learn, 12, 127–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-017-9257-7
q2 · i? · review · r2
The editorial attributes this overall conclusion to Wang et al., whose study compared the three script conditions with regard to effectiveness. This is the editorial's summary of the included study's conclusion.
"Wang et al. conclude that overall, adaptable collaborative scripts have a positive effect on self-regulation skills."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Both adaptable and non-adaptable collaboration scripts decreased student planning, while planning increased in the non-scripted condition — related
- A daily learning diary alone (Group D) did not produce statistically significant pre-post gains on any measured outcome in an online mathematics preparation course — related
- In Experiment 1, self-regulation skills significantly predicted socio-discursive MAS only in the adaptable CSCL script condition — related
- Metacognitive prompts improve learning — a broader claim this one bears on
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
adaptable-script-monitoring-self-regulation-effects |
title |
Reflection increased in the adaptable and non-adaptable script conditions, but only the adaptable script had positive effects on monitoring, supporting overall positive effects on self-regulation |
description |
Reflection increased in the adaptable and non-adaptable script conditions, but only the adaptable script had positive effects on monitoring, supporting overall positive effects on self-regulation |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2017 |
source_checked |
2026-10-20 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — ludvigsen-2017, ludvigsen-2017-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.