Claims

Adult ability attributions of young children's success increase test cheating, per the article's title

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r? · q1
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? Adult ability attributions of young children's success increase test cheating. → Li Zhao 2024

Evidence

Li Zhao 2024

Li Zhao, Junjie Peng, Yingying Li, Nan Wang, and Kang Lee. (2024). When 'You are Smart' Backfires: Adult Ability Attributions of Young Children's Success Increase Test Cheating. https://osf.io/bh9t4/?view_only=04c6a0c8457a49e19911c9a4ea4e1c16

q1 · i? · causal · r?

The supplied text consists of the title page and open-practices disclosure; the finding that ability attributions of young children's success increase test cheating is stated only in the title, "Adult Ability Attributions of Young Children's Success Increase Test Cheating". No results text, statistics, or sample sizes are printed in the supplied text.

"When 'You are Smart' Backfires: Adult Ability Attributions of Young Children's Success Increase Test Cheating"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id adult-ability-attributions-increase-child-test-cheating
title Adult ability attributions of young children's success increase test cheating, per the article's title
description Adult ability attributions of young children's success increase test cheating, per the article's title
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2024
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-23
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — li-zhao-2024

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.