In adults, face recognition performance is predicted by eye movement pattern, with eye movement consistency adding no additional variance¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Reanalysis of two prior adult datasets showed pattern predicted recognition while adding entropy did not significantly explain additional variance. → Hsiao 2022
Evidence¶
Hsiao 2022¶
Hsiao, J. H., An, J., Hui, V. K. S., Zheng, Y. & Chan, A. B. (2022). Understanding the role of eye movement consistency in face recognition and autism through integrating deep neural networks and hidden Markov models. npj Science of Learning 7:28. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-022-00139-6
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Multiple regression reanalysis of data from Chuk et al. (adults): "recognition performance was best predicted by eye movement pattern" (R2 = 21.8%); entropy added no significant variance (ΔR2 = 0.002). Using Chan et al. data, pattern correlated with performance (r = −0.25) but consistency did not.
"recognition performance was best predicted by eye movement pattern, R2 = 21.8%, p = 0.001, and adding consistency did not significantly account for additional variance, ΔR2 = 0.002, p = 0.726"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- A less eyes-focused pattern and lower eye movement consistency jointly predict poorer recognition beyond age and cognitive abilities — reports the opposite
- Older age is associated with lower eye movement consistency in face recognition, reflected in higher overall entropy and C3 entropy — related
- Lower eye movement consistency (higher C3 entropy) is associated with poorer selective attention and inhibitory control — related
- A more eyes-focused scanning pattern and higher eye movement consistency are each correlated with better face recognition performance — related
- In typically developing children aged 6–11, face recognition performance is predicted by eye movement consistency but not by eye movement pattern — related
- Children's eye movement consistency is associated with selective attention and executive function, whereas eye movement pattern relates to working memory — related
- In partially trained DNN+HMM models simulating children, eye movement consistency (lower entropy) predicts recognition accuracy but eye movement pattern does not — related
- In well-trained DNN+HMM face-recognition models, an eyes-focused eye movement pattern yields higher recognition accuracy than a nose-focused pattern — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
adults-pattern-not-consistency-predicts-recognition |
title |
In adults, face recognition performance is predicted by eye movement pattern, with eye movement consistency adding no additional variance |
description |
In adults, face recognition performance is predicted by eye movement pattern, with eye movement consistency adding no additional variance |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2022 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — hsiao-2022 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.