Late-afternoon immediate memory work shows about 2 per cent relative inefficiency compared with early morning work in 11-year-old boys¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 1911 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Design limits · W. H. Winch 1911: the intervention came bundled with another change (read from the study by two models, 2026-10-25)
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? In a class of 51 boys averaging 11 years, the afternoon group improved on its preliminary record by 1 per cent while the morning group improved by 3 per cent, an advantage of about 2 per cent in improvability for morning workers. → W. H. Winch 1911
Evidence¶
W. H. Winch 1911¶
W. H. Winch. (1911). Mental Fatigue in Day School Children as Measured by Immediate Memory. Part II. The Journal of Educational Psychology. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Journal_of_Educational_Psychology
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Controlled school experiment with two equal groups of a Standard IV class (51 boys) matched on four preliminary consonant-memory tests, one tested mornings (9.45–10 A.M.) and one afternoons (4–4.15 P.M.) on four final tests. The article reports "an advantage of 2 per cent, in improvability of the morning over the afternoon workers"; no standardized effect size is printed.
"Group A—the morning group—improves on its preliminary record to the extent of 3 per cent.: Group B—the afternoon group—improves on its preliminary record to the extent of 1 per cent. There is apparently an advantage of 2 per cent, in improvability of the morning over the afternoon workers."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Late-afternoon memory work shows relative inefficiency of about 5-6 per cent compared with early-morning work in 13-year-old boys — related
- Improvement by practice continues in both morning and afternoon groups, but the morning group improves faster across weeks — related
- About one in seven boys in the afternoon group ceased to improve and tended downwards, compared with one in the morning group — related
- Exception: the top section of afternoon workers did better work than the corresponding morning section — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
afternoon-memory-inefficiency-two-percent-winch-1911 |
title |
Late-afternoon immediate memory work shows about 2 per cent relative inefficiency compared with early morning work in 11-year-old boys |
description |
Late-afternoon immediate memory work shows about 2 per cent relative inefficiency compared with early morning work in 11-year-old boys |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
1911 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-25 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — w-h-winch-1911 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.