Claims

The combination of age, education, and RWH explains 16% of variance in speech graph attributes, with short- and long-range recurrences explained only by their combination and the RWH coefficient compensating for the aging effect

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Canonical correlations between the set {age, education, RWH} and the set {RE, LCC, LSC} were significant and explained 16% of the variance. → Malcorra 2022 q2 i? Short- and long-range recurrences were explained only by the combination of age, education, and RWH, not by any variable in isolation; the strength of RWH's coefficient compensated for the aging effect. → Malcorra 2022 (2)

Evidence

Malcorra 2022

Malcorra, B. L. C., Mota, N. B., Weissheimer, J., Schilling, L. P., Wilson, M. A. & Hübner, L. C. (2022). Reading and writing habits compensate for aging effects in speech connectedness. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-022-00129-8

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Canonical correlation analysis associating two sets of variables (age, education, RWH versus RE, LCC, LSC) on the 118-participant narrative data, reported in Fig. 1. The article reports "This explained 16% of the variance"; no standardized effect size in d/r/η² form is printed.

"There were signi ficant canonical correlations between the combination of age, education, and RWH with the three graph attributes. This explained 16% of the variance"

Malcorra 2022 (2)

Malcorra, B. L. C., Mota, N. B., Weissheimer, J., Schilling, L. P., Wilson, M. A. & Hübner, L. C. (2022). Reading and writing habits compensate for aging effects in speech connectedness. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-022-00129-8

q2 · i? · associational · r2

The same canonical analysis showed the graph attributes were explained only by the joint set of social/age variables; LCC and RWH "had higher coef ficients and co-varied in the same direction," while RE co-varied with age and in opposition to RWH and education.

"Therefore, short- and long-range recurrences were only explained by the combination of age, education, and RWH and not by any of these variables in isolation."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id age-education-rwh-canonical-combination-explains-16-percent
title The combination of age, education, and RWH explains 16% of variance in speech graph attributes, with short- and long-range recurrences explained only by their combination and the RWH coefficient compensating for the aging effect
description The combination of age, education, and RWH explains 16% of variance in speech graph attributes, with short- and long-range recurrences explained only by their combination and the RWH coefficient compensating for the a...
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2022
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — malcorra-2022, malcorra-2022-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.