The combination of age, education, and RWH explains 16% of variance in speech graph attributes, with short- and long-range recurrences explained only by their combination and the RWH coefficient compensating for the aging effect¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associationalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Canonical correlations between the set {age, education, RWH} and the set {RE, LCC, LSC} were significant and explained 16% of the variance. → Malcorra 2022
q2 i? Short- and long-range recurrences were explained only by the combination of age, education, and RWH, not by any variable in isolation; the strength of RWH's coefficient compensated for the aging effect. → Malcorra 2022 (2)
Evidence¶
Malcorra 2022¶
Malcorra, B. L. C., Mota, N. B., Weissheimer, J., Schilling, L. P., Wilson, M. A. & Hübner, L. C. (2022). Reading and writing habits compensate for aging effects in speech connectedness. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-022-00129-8
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Canonical correlation analysis associating two sets of variables (age, education, RWH versus RE, LCC, LSC) on the 118-participant narrative data, reported in Fig. 1. The article reports "This explained 16% of the variance"; no standardized effect size in d/r/η² form is printed.
"There were signi ficant canonical correlations between the combination of age, education, and RWH with the three graph attributes. This explained 16% of the variance"
Malcorra 2022 (2)¶
Malcorra, B. L. C., Mota, N. B., Weissheimer, J., Schilling, L. P., Wilson, M. A. & Hübner, L. C. (2022). Reading and writing habits compensate for aging effects in speech connectedness. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-022-00129-8
q2 · i? · associational · r2
The same canonical analysis showed the graph attributes were explained only by the joint set of social/age variables; LCC and RWH "had higher coef ficients and co-varied in the same direction," while RE co-varied with age and in opposition to RWH and education.
"Therefore, short- and long-range recurrences were only explained by the combination of age, education, and RWH and not by any of these variables in isolation."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Advancing age correlates with more short-range recurrences and less speech connectedness in oral narratives of typical older adults, but these correlations lose significance when corrected for education and reading and writing habits — related
- Reading and writing habits correlate negatively with short-range recurrences and positively with speech connectedness (LCC), remaining significant when corrected for age — related
- Education correlates positively with speech connectedness (LCC) in typical older adults, remaining significant when corrected for age but losing significance when corrected for reading and writing habits — related
- In this sample, age correlated negatively with education and not significantly with RWH, while education correlated positively with RWH (R = 0.58) — related
- School enrollment is associated with narrative connectedness development: the RE-decrease/LCC-LSC-increase dynamic was interrupted by mid-year vacations and resumed after return to school. — related
- Single-point connectedness measures from three stories are stable across the study period. — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
age-education-rwh-canonical-combination-explains-16-percent |
title |
The combination of age, education, and RWH explains 16% of variance in speech graph attributes, with short- and long-range recurrences explained only by their combination and the RWH coefficient compensating for the aging effect |
description |
The combination of age, education, and RWH explains 16% of variance in speech graph attributes, with short- and long-range recurrences explained only by their combination and the RWH coefficient compensating for the a... |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2022 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — malcorra-2022, malcorra-2022-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.