In the social/affective strategy group, age showed no relationship with reading scores (r = .083, p = .663)¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2 · i0 negligible
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i0 Age was not related to reading scores in the social/affective group (r = .083, p = .663). → Mahdiyeh Seyed Beheshti Nasab & Seyyed Fariborz Pishdadi Motlagh 2015

Evidence¶

Mahdiyeh Seyed Beheshti Nasab & Seyyed Fariborz Pishdadi Motlagh 2015¶

Mahdiyeh Seyed Beheshti Nasab & Seyyed Fariborz Pishdadi Motlagh. (2015). A Complete Review for Metacognitive, Cognitive, and Social/Affective Strategies as Essential Components of Learning strategies and their relationships with EFL Learners' Reading Comprehension Promotion. Advances in Language and Literary Studies. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.6n.3p.166

q2 · i0 · causal · r1

Pearson correlation of age with reading scores in the social/affective group (N=30); Table 23 prints r = .083, p = .663. The article concludes there is "not any relationship between them"; equivalence was not tested.

"according to pearson correlation p=0.66 and it is more than 0.05 so the results rejects the hypothesis and manifests that there is not any relationship between them."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• In the metacognitive strategy group, older learners' reading scores were lower (r = -.427, p = .019) — related
• Strategy-use scores showed no significant correlation with reading scores in the cognitive and social/affective groups — related
• In the cognitive strategy group, older learners' reading scores were higher (r = 0.5, p = 0.04) — related