Older students perceive self-assessment as more useful than younger students, while no gender differences were reported¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Older students reported self-assessment as more helpful than younger students. → Zi Yan · Ernesto Panadero · Xiang Wang · Ying Zhan 2023 q2 i? No study reported a significant gender difference in overall perceived usefulness. → Zi Yan · Ernesto Panadero · Xiang Wang · Ying Zhan 2023 (2)

Evidence¶

Zi Yan · Ernesto Panadero · Xiang Wang · Ying Zhan 2023¶

Zi Yan · Ernesto Panadero · Xiang Wang · Ying Zhan. (2023). A Systematic Review on Students' Perceptions of Self-Assessment: Usefulness and Factors Influencing Implementation. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09799-1

q2 · i? · review · r3

The review reports, citing Gashi-Shatri and Zabeli (2018), that older grade students believed self-assessment helped them more than younger grade students; Bakx et al. (2002) found fourth-year university students more positive than first- and second-year students.

"Gashi-Shatri and Zabeli (2018) found that 10th—12th grade students (15–18 years old) believed that self-assessment helped them more than 6th—9th grade students (12–14 years old)"

Zi Yan · Ernesto Panadero · Xiang Wang · Ying Zhan 2023 (2)¶

q2 · i? · review · r3

Review synthesis across five studies of individual factors: "No study reported a significant difference in students' overall perceived usefulness of self-assessment across genders." No effect sizes are printed; equivalence was not tested.

"No study reported a significant difference in students' overall perceived usefulness of self-assessment across genders."

Discussion¶

Learner Variables¶

Age and Developmental Stage — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes

The usefulness of app components varied by child's age: conversation starters were too advanced for some younger children but helpful for older children — related

Page metadata

Field	Value
`type`	`claim`
`id`	`age-positive-gender-null-perceived-usefulness-self-assessment`
`title`	`Older students perceive self-assessment as more useful than younger students, while no gender differences were reported`
`description`	`Older students perceive self-assessment as more useful than younger students, while no gender differences were reported`
`status`	`review`
`evidence_strength`	`weak`
`newest_evidence`	`2023`
`generated`	by `process:wiki-ingest` on `2026-10-21`
`trust`	unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
`sources`	2 — `zi-yan-ernesto-panadero-xiang-wang-ying-zhan-2023`, `zi-yan-ernesto-panadero-xiang-wang-ying-zhan-2023-2`

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.