The 32 included studies were predominantly quantitative and cross-sectional, with questionnaire sample sizes ranging from 17 to 815 students¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · reviewr3·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Most included studies were quantitative (n = 22), with five qualitative and five mixed-methods studies; 27 were cross-sectional and five longitudinal. → Navarro-Ibáñez 2026
q2 i? Questionnaire sample sizes ranged from 17 to 815 students. → Navarro-Ibáñez 2026 (2)
Evidence¶
Navarro-Ibáñez 2026¶
Navarro-Ibáñez, M., Balladares, J., Sprovera, I., Manaut, C., & Infante, M. (2026). Help! I Need Somebody: A Systematic Review of Academic Help-Seeking Among Pre-Service Teachers. Educational Psychology Review, 38, 115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-026-10208-6
q2 · i? · review · r3
Descriptive analysis for Research Question 1 across the 32 included studies. The review reports "a quantitative approach (n = 22)", five qualitative and five mixed-methods studies, with 27 cross-sectional and five longitudinal designs.
"Most of the studies included in this review employed a quantitative approach (n = 22), reflecting a predominant trend in AHS research. In contrast, five qualitative studies were identified. Additionally, five studies adopted a mixed-methods design."
Navarro-Ibáñez 2026 (2)¶
Navarro-Ibáñez, M., Balladares, J., Sprovera, I., Manaut, C., & Infante, M. (2026). Help! I Need Somebody: A Systematic Review of Academic Help-Seeking Among Pre-Service Teachers. Educational Psychology Review, 38, 115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-026-10208-6
q2 · i? · review · r3
Descriptive synthesis of sampling across quantitative questionnaire studies. The review reports sample sizes "ranging from 17 students (Kim et al., 2025) to 815 students (Schilling et al., 2025)", plus a 30-participant pilot study.
"Quantitative studies that employed questionnaires reported sample sizes ranging from 17 students (Kim et al., 2025) to 815 students (Schilling et al., 2025), with one pilot study involving 30 participants (Vásquez-Colina et al., 2014)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Research on teachers' SRL knowledge is methodologically dominated by cross-sectional quantitative designs with non-standardized measures — related
- Most cross-sectional studies report positive teacher-student SEC links, while teacher-targeted intervention trials show mixed distal effects on students — related
- The reviewed evidence base is predominantly cross-sectional, with small self-report-heavy teacher samples — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
ahs-pst-study-design-profile |
title |
The 32 included studies were predominantly quantitative and cross-sectional, with questionnaire sample sizes ranging from 17 to 815 students |
description |
The 32 included studies were predominantly quantitative and cross-sectional, with questionnaire sample sizes ranging from 17 to 815 students |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — navarro-ibáñez-2026, navarro-ibáñez-2026-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.