Experts rate AI-related competences for learners and educators as the highest-impact and most important AI-in-education trend¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? In a Delphi survey of 70 international experts, AI-related competences for learners and educators received the highest mean Impact rating (M = 8.57) and the highest Importance rating (M = 8.64), with a positive priority indicator despite high perceived challenge. → Rwitajit Majumdar 2026
Evidence¶
Rwitajit Majumdar 2026¶
Rwitajit Majumdar, Dirk Ifenthaler, Clara Schumacher, Enda Donlon, Hsiao-Ping Hsu, Jason Zagami, Maaike Heitink, Wolfgang Mueller. (2026). Fostering collaborative futures: Multidisciplinary approaches to AI integration in educational ecosystems. Computers and Education Open 11 (2026) 100405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2026.100405
q2 · i? · associational · r1
Delphi survey phase in which 70 international experts rated 15 AI-in-education themes on importance, impact, and challenges (1–10 scale). The article reports the competence theme as highest-rated: "AI-related competences for learners and educators (M = 8.57)" for Impact and M = 8.64 for Importance.
"The highest-rated theme in terms of Impact was AI-related competences for learners and educators (M = 8.57), which also emerged as the most Important (M = 8.64). Although it was perceived as relatively challenging (M = 7.49), it still held a positive priority indicator"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Experts rated overall importance of AI in education higher than impact and challenge, but the differences were not statistically significant — a broader claim this one bears on
- Explainability/trustworthiness and accessibility/equal access of AI agents rank prominently in impact and importance but carry high challenge ratings — related
- Evolved teacher roles with AI agents rank high in impact but are rated among the most challenging themes, with a negative priority indicator — related
- Automated formative assessment and feedback with AI agents ranks second-highest in impact with moderate perceived challenge — related
- Monte Carlo simulation confirms weight and score stability of the expert-derived priorities under judgment perturbation — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
ai-competences-highest-rated-delphi-trend |
title |
Experts rate AI-related competences for learners and educators as the highest-impact and most important AI-in-education trend |
description |
Experts rate AI-related competences for learners and educators as the highest-impact and most important AI-in-education trend |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-12 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — rwitajit-majumdar-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.