Claims

AI dependency differs by AI usage frequency and academic year but not gender

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (3 entries) · associational r1–r2 · q2 · i1–i3
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i3 AI dependency significantly varied across frequency of AI use (η² = 0.177). → Huang Q 2026 q2 i1 AI dependency differed across academic years with a small effect size (η² = 0.031), with seniors higher than juniors. → Huang Q 2026 (2) q2 i? AI dependency did not significantly differ by gender. → Huang Q 2026 (3)

Evidence

Huang Q 2026

Huang Q, Tu S, Lin J, Lu L and Lv C (2026). The dark side of AI in education: AI dependency as a mediator linking academic self-efficacy and teacher support to learning burnout among university students. Front. Psychol. 17:1889053. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1889053

q2 · i3 · associational · r1

One-way ANOVA in the group-difference analyses of the survey sample. AI dependency "significantly varied across frequency of AI use" with F(4,271) = 14.569, η 2 = 0.177, which the authors call a relatively larger effect size.

"AI dependency significantly varied across frequency of AI use [ F(4,271) = 14.569, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.177]."

Huang Q 2026 (2)

Huang Q, Tu S, Lin J, Lu L and Lv C (2026). The dark side of AI in education: AI dependency as a mediator linking academic self-efficacy and teacher support to learning burnout among university students. Front. Psychol. 17:1889053. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1889053

q2 · i1 · associational · r2

One-way ANOVA across academic years in the same group-difference analyses, described as "a small effect size" with F(3,272) = 2.858, η 2 = 0.031; seniors reported higher AI dependency than juniors.

"a significant difference was observed across academic years with a small effect size [ F(3,272) = 2.858, p = 0.037, η 2 = 0.031], and post-hoc comparisons further showed that senior students reported higher levels of AI dependency than junior students."

Huang Q 2026 (3)

Huang Q, Tu S, Lin J, Lu L and Lv C (2026). The dark side of AI in education: AI dependency as a mediator linking academic self-efficacy and teacher support to learning burnout among university students. Front. Psychol. 17:1889053. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1889053

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Independent-samples t-test in the group-difference analyses; no statistically significant gender difference was detected, and equivalence was not tested.

"AI dependency did not significantly differ by gender ( t(274) = –1.053, p = 0.293)."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id ai-dependency-group-differences-usage-frequency-year
title AI dependency differs by AI usage frequency and academic year but not gender
description AI dependency differs by AI usage frequency and academic year but not gender
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2026
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 3 — huang-q-2026, huang-q-2026-2, huang-q-2026-3

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.