Health professionals' AI competency reviews most frequently identify AI fundamentals as an essential competency (reported by 86% of included studies)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2030: baselines and conditions change
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? AI fundamentals was the most frequently reported competency, identified by 86% of the 7 included studies. → Gazquez-Garcia J 2025
Evidence¶
Gazquez-Garcia J 2025¶
Gazquez-Garcia J, Sánchez-Bocanegra CL, Sevillano JL. (2025). AI in the Health Sector: Systematic Review of Key Skills for Future Health Professionals. JMIR Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.2196/58161
q3 · i? · review · r2
Systematic review of 7 included studies on AI competencies for health professionals; the review reports that "AI fundamentals were identified as an essential competency by 86% of the studies".
"AI fundamentals were identified as an essential competency by 86% of the studies [23-2729undefinedundefinedundefinedundefined]."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.