The review reports some evidence that over-dependence on AI contributes to cognitive offloading and decreased independent reasoning, while guided AI use can be helpful¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Over-dependence on AI is reported as a factor in cognitive offloading, decreased independent reasoning, and altered academic behavior, whereas guided AI use is reported as helpful. → Padhy 2026

Evidence¶

Padhy 2026¶

Padhy, A. (2026). Is using artificial intelligence tools for academic work cheating? Student perceptions, ethics, and the impact on academic performance and critical thinking. International Journal of Applied Resilience and Sustainability, 2(2), 919-942. https://doi.org/10.70593/deepsci.0202038

q2 · i? · review · r?

Systematic literature review of studies on AI ethics in education and academic misconduct. The review states there is "some evidence that over-dependence on AI can be a factor in Cognitive Offloading" and related outcomes, while guided use can help. No effect sizes are printed.

"There is also some evidence that over-dependence on AI can be a factor in Cognitive Offloading, decreased independent reasoning, and altered academic behavior, and that it can be helpful to use AI guided."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Cognitive offloading to AI during early learning can stifle development of stable knowledge and skills — related
• Productive cognitive offloading to AI can shift into cognitive surrender, abdicating learner intellectual agency — related
• Some AI tools can inhibit productive struggle by reducing cognitive effort when they automate processes students would otherwise reason through — related
• AI scaffolding differs from human scaffolding in availability, feedback timing, and dynamic adjustment, making its developmental impact conditional — related
• Student perceptions of AI use in academic work are neutral and range from viewing AI as valid learning assistance to viewing it as cheating, depending on task type, transparency, and assessment design — related
• Review reports a developmental shift in cognitive offloading: children under-use external aids while adolescents over-rely on them — related
• Substitutive offloaders show severe performance decline when external stores become unavailable, while duplicative offloaders maintain accuracy — related
• Cognitive offloading to generative AI is associated with reduced learner engagement, lower critical thinking, and lower-quality reasoning — related
• GenAI undermines evidence rules by making work products ambiguous between student competence and AI capability, with substitution capacity depending on task cognitive demands — related
• Engineering faculty report reluctant engagement with GenAI, concerns about cognitive offloading, and frustration with uncoordinated institutional policy — related
• Longitudinal studies of trust and reliance in AI advice examine whether users rely appropriately over time but not whether independent reasoning capacity is maintained — related
• Over-reliance on AI dialogue systems reduces students' critical and analytical thinking skills, especially when they become overly dependent on AI-generated content — related
• AI's key contribution in STEM education is intelligent scaffolding that lowers the threshold for understanding knowledge, driving a shift from knowledge transmission to capability development — related
• Delegating intellectual work to generative AI risks eroding epistemic agency through reduced critical effort and cognitive offloading — related
• Fully offloading schoolwork to generative AI without personal input forgoes meaningful engagement and skill development — related