Only 3 of 14 AI applications in the reviewed studies provided comprehensive support across all three phases of Zimmerman's SRL model¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Among 14 reviewed studies, only three AI applications supported the forethought, performance, and self-reflection phases comprehensively, while half concentrated on the performance phase. → Min Lan & Xiaofeng Zhou 2025
Evidence¶
Min Lan & Xiaofeng Zhou 2025¶
Min Lan & Xiaofeng Zhou. (2025). A qualitative systematic review on AI empowered self-regulated learning in higher education. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-025-00319-0
q3 · i? · review · r2
Qualitative synthesis of 14 studies identified through PRISMA screening of 230 articles. The review reports that "only three (3 of 14) applications provided comprehensive support across all phases of SRL" and half focused on the performance phase.
"However, only three (3 of 14) applications provided comprehensive support across all phases of SRL as outlined in Zimmer-man's model, in which three phases are aligned. Half of these studies (7 of 14) concentrated their support on the performance phase"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.