Students who used AI reported feeling less accomplished, with heavier reliance associated with greater loss of satisfaction¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitativer3·q2
Currency · no dated study recorded · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Most students who used AI reported feeling less accomplished after AI use, and heavier reliance was described as a greater loss of satisfaction. → intrinsic-1
Evidence¶
intrinsic-1¶
Keith Tran, Colton Harper, and Thomas Price. 2026. "Why Put in This Much Effort?": How AI Availability Shapes Students' Motivation in Introductory Programming. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research Vol. 1 (ICER 2026 Vol. 1). https://doi.org/10.1145/3765964.3811653
q2 · i? · qualitative · r3
In the intrinsic-value findings of this qualitative interview study, eight of thirteen AI-using students described reduced accomplishment. P10 stated "I definitely feel less accomplished after I use AI, just because I didn't do it myself."
"Most students who used AI (8 of 13) reported feeling less accomplished, and those who relied on it more heavily described a greater loss of satisfaction."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Motivation — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- GenAI-assisted education produces significantly higher learning motivation than non-GenAI approaches (g = 0.81) — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
- Knowing AI could complete assignments made the cost of independent programming effort feel less worthwhile to strongly motivated students — related
- Motivational Disengagement, reported by 270 participants, captures reduced initiative and eroding confidence linked to AI reliance — related
- Students reported satisfaction with the detailed analyses, personalized multi-dimensional recommendations and motivational guidance provided by the AI systems — reports the opposite
- Nearly all students valued learning through effort while feeling drawn toward AI, and split into those who limited use and those whose use conflicted with stated values — related
- Students in both conditions named awareness of their reliance on AI as the most valuable course outcome, and unrestricted-AI students described shallow engagement they could not stop — related
- AI-assisted autonomous learning is positively associated with reduced academic accomplishment — related
- Peer AI use diminished some students' sense of their own effort's value through social comparison, independent of their own AI use — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
ai-use-reduces-accomplishment-intrinsic-value |
title |
Students who used AI reported feeling less accomplished, with heavier reliance associated with greater loss of satisfaction |
description |
Students who used AI reported feeling less accomplished, with heavier reliance associated with greater loss of satisfaction |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — intrinsic-1 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.