Claims

Aided AAC systems show advantages over manual signs for acquiring requests, and motor imitation and matching skills predict manual sign acquisition

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Evidence quality · No study behind this claim is a peer-reviewed article with a DOI: it rests on a source with no registered publication record (a web page, book or unpublished report). It is kept because 3 design pages cite it; treat it as a lead to check, not an established finding.

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Children with autism showed a tendency to acquire PE responses more easily and rapidly than signed responses. → Nam 2018 q2 i? Motor imitation and matching skills appear to be prerequisites for acquisition of manual signs. → Nam 2018 (2)

Evidence

Nam 2018

Nam, S., Kim, J., & Sparks, S. (2018). An Overview of Review Studies on Effectiveness of Major AAC Systems for Individuals with Developmental Disabilities Including Autism. The Journal of Special Education Apprenticeship, 7(2). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1185374

q2 · i? · review · r2

Overview of the Nam and Hwang (2016) review of three empirical studies comparing PE and manual sign training with mands acquisition as the dependent variable; the direction is stated as a tendency, not a definitive result.

"The review indicated a tendency that children with autism acquire PE responses more easily and rapidly than signed responses."

Nam 2018 (2)

Nam, S., Kim, J., & Sparks, S. (2018). An Overview of Review Studies on Effectiveness of Major AAC Systems for Individuals with Developmental Disabilities Including Autism. The Journal of Special Education Apprenticeship, 7(2). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1185374

q2 · i? · review · r2

The article attributes the prerequisite relationship to the Gregory, DeLeon, and Richman (2009) study, which assessed existing matching and motor-imitation skills of children with autism and intellectual disability and found these skills prerequisite for learning manual signs.

"Both motor imitation and matching skills seem prerequisites for acquisition of manual signs based on the study by Gregory, DeLeon, and Richman (2009)."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id aided-systems-advantage-over-manual-signs
title Aided AAC systems show advantages over manual signs for acquiring requests, and motor imitation and matching skills predict manual sign acquisition
description Aided AAC systems show advantages over manual signs for acquiring requests, and motor imitation and matching skills predict manual sign acquisition
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2018
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-25
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — nam-2018, nam-2018-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.