Claims

All four participants used all four self perspectives, with rapid shifts among them during HPT

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In the think-aloud study, every participant used all four self perspectives and shifted among them, with up to 14 switches within a single document. → Nilsen 2016

Evidence

Nilsen 2016

Nilsen, A. P. (2016). Navigating windows into past human minds: A framework of shifting selves in historical perspective taking. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25, 372-410. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2016.1160830

q2 · i? · qualitative · r2

Qualitative think-aloud analysis of four participants' transcripts reading Salem and Józefów documents. The article reports that "All four participants used all four self perspectives, often making rapid shifts among them," and that shifts varied, "with 14 as the maximum number of switches for one document."

"All four participants used all four self perspectives, often making rapid shifts among them. To illustrate, Figure 1 traces the switches that each participant made while reading two documents"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id all-four-participants-used-all-four-self-perspectives
title All four participants used all four self perspectives, with rapid shifts among them during HPT
description All four participants used all four self perspectives, with rapid shifts among them during HPT
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2016
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — nilsen-2016

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.