Claims

Alpha neurofeedback training increases alpha amplitude within training sessions relative to sham control, but the increase does not persist across sessions

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r2 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 A significant Group × Block interaction showed alpha changes across blocks differed between the NF and sham groups, with alpha increased in blocks 3–5 versus block 1 in the NF group only (ηp2 = 0.273). → Zhou 2024 q3 i? Neither the Group × Day interaction nor the Group main effect was significant for alpha across sessions, indicating unsuccessful long-term NF learning. → Zhou 2024 (2)

Evidence

Zhou 2024

Zhou, W., Nan, W., Xiong, K., & Ku, Y. (2024). Alpha neurofeedback training improves visual working memory in healthy individuals. npj Science of Learning 9, 32. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-024-00242-w

q3 · i3 · causal · r2

Within-session alpha amplitude analysis (2×5 mixed-design repeated-measures ANOVA on mean alpha per block) during NF training; the interaction printed ηp2 = 0.273. "Further analysis found a significant increase in alpha amplitude in the last three blocks (blocks 3 to 5) compared to Block 1 in the NF group, which was not the case in the sham control group."

"Group × Block has a significant interaction (F (4,35) = 3.29, p = 0.022, ηp 2 = 0.273), indicating that alpha changes across blocks significantly differed between the NF training group and the sham control group"

Zhou 2024 (2)

Zhou, W., Nan, W., Xiong, K., & Ku, Y. (2024). Alpha neurofeedback training improves visual working memory in healthy individuals. npj Science of Learning 9, 32. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-024-00242-w

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Across-session alpha analysis (2×5 mixed-design repeated-measures ANOVA on mean alpha per session over five days); the day main effect was only marginally significant (F(4,35) = 2.54, p = 0.057, ηp2 = 0.225).

"In contrast, neither Group× Day interaction (F (4,35) = 0.22, p = 0.924) nor the main effect of group (F (1,38) = 1.21,p =0 . 2 7 8 )s h o w e d significance"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id alpha-nf-within-session-alpha-increase
title Alpha neurofeedback training increases alpha amplitude within training sessions relative to sham control, but the increase does not persist across sessions
description Alpha neurofeedback training increases alpha amplitude within training sessions relative to sham control, but the increase does not persist across sessions
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2024
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — zhou-2024, zhou-2024-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.