Alpha neurofeedback training increases alpha amplitude within training sessions relative to sham control, but the increase does not persist across sessions¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr2·q3·i3large
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i3 A significant Group × Block interaction showed alpha changes across blocks differed between the NF and sham groups, with alpha increased in blocks 3–5 versus block 1 in the NF group only (ηp2 = 0.273). → Zhou 2024
q3 i? Neither the Group × Day interaction nor the Group main effect was significant for alpha across sessions, indicating unsuccessful long-term NF learning. → Zhou 2024 (2)
Evidence¶
Zhou 2024¶
Zhou, W., Nan, W., Xiong, K., & Ku, Y. (2024). Alpha neurofeedback training improves visual working memory in healthy individuals. npj Science of Learning 9, 32. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-024-00242-w
q3 · i3 · causal · r2
Within-session alpha amplitude analysis (2×5 mixed-design repeated-measures ANOVA on mean alpha per block) during NF training; the interaction printed ηp2 = 0.273. "Further analysis found a significant increase in alpha amplitude in the last three blocks (blocks 3 to 5) compared to Block 1 in the NF group, which was not the case in the sham control group."
"Group × Block has a significant interaction (F (4,35) = 3.29, p = 0.022, ηp 2 = 0.273), indicating that alpha changes across blocks significantly differed between the NF training group and the sham control group"
Zhou 2024 (2)¶
Zhou, W., Nan, W., Xiong, K., & Ku, Y. (2024). Alpha neurofeedback training improves visual working memory in healthy individuals. npj Science of Learning 9, 32. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-024-00242-w
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Across-session alpha analysis (2×5 mixed-design repeated-measures ANOVA on mean alpha per session over five days); the day main effect was only marginally significant (F(4,35) = 2.54, p = 0.057, ηp2 = 0.225).
"In contrast, neither Group× Day interaction (F (4,35) = 0.22, p = 0.924) nor the main effect of group (F (1,38) = 1.21,p =0 . 2 7 8 )s h o w e d significance"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Alpha neurofeedback training improves visual working memory precision in the interference condition of a color-recall task, but not in the non-interference condition — related
- Alpha neurofeedback training improves visual working memory capacity measured by the Corsi-block tapping task, with an effect lasting seven days after training ends — related
- Alpha neurofeedback training produces no change in alpha ERSP or pre-stimulus alpha in the encoding and maintenance phases of the modified Sternberg task — related
- Alpha neurofeedback increases prefrontal alpha power more than sham feedback — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
alpha-nf-within-session-alpha-increase |
title |
Alpha neurofeedback training increases alpha amplitude within training sessions relative to sham control, but the increase does not persist across sessions |
description |
Alpha neurofeedback training increases alpha amplitude within training sessions relative to sham control, but the increase does not persist across sessions |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2024 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — zhou-2024, zhou-2024-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.