Claims

Alpha-rate (10 Hz) but not theta-rate (5 Hz) sensory stimulation improves accuracy of speech-print associative learning compared to a null-stimulation control

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r1–r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Alpha-rate (10 Hz) sensory entrainment significantly improved response accuracy in paired associative learning compared to the Null condition. → Zhijun Liao 2024 q3 i? Theta-rate (5 Hz) stimulation did not significantly modulate paired associative learning accuracy relative to the Null condition. → Zhijun Liao 2024 (2)

Evidence

Zhijun Liao 2024

Zhijun Liao, Xiya Ao, Yulu Sun, Manli Zhang & Xiangzhi Meng. (2024). Alpha sensory stimulation modulates theta phase during speech-print associative learning. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-024-00263-5

q3 · i? · causal · r1

Between-subjects experiment: 36 Chinese undergraduates were randomly assigned to a 10 Hz tone-flash entrainment condition and performed the PAL task; independent-samples t-test against the Null control group showed "t41 = −2.39, p = 0.021" with mean accuracy 0.95 vs 0.91. Only a t statistic was printed, so no effect size is reported here.

"First, α-rate sensory entrainment (M ± SD = 0.95 ± 0.03; t41 = −2.39, p = 0.021) significantly improved the response accuracy compared to the Nullcondition [0.91 ± 0.06]"

Zhijun Liao 2024 (2)

Zhijun Liao, Xiya Ao, Yulu Sun, Manli Zhang & Xiangzhi Meng. (2024). Alpha sensory stimulation modulates theta phase during speech-print associative learning. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-024-00263-5

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Same between-subjects PAL experiment: the 5 Hz theta stimulation group's accuracy (0.92 ± 0.08) did not differ from the Null condition, "t41 = 0.60, p = 0.595". A non-significant test with no printed effect size; equivalence was not tested.

"while θ-rate stimulation (0.92 ± 0.08;t41 = 0.60, p = 0.595) did not modulate the performance of associative learning (Fig. 1b)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id alpha-stim-improves-speech-print-associative-learning
title Alpha-rate (10 Hz) but not theta-rate (5 Hz) sensory stimulation improves accuracy of speech-print associative learning compared to a null-stimulation control
description Alpha-rate (10 Hz) but not theta-rate (5 Hz) sensory stimulation improves accuracy of speech-print associative learning compared to a null-stimulation control
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2024
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — zhijun-liao-2024, zhijun-liao-2024-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.