Alpha-rate (10 Hz) but not theta-rate (5 Hz) sensory stimulation improves accuracy of speech-print associative learning compared to a null-stimulation control¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr1–r2·q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Alpha-rate (10 Hz) sensory entrainment significantly improved response accuracy in paired associative learning compared to the Null condition. → Zhijun Liao 2024
q3 i? Theta-rate (5 Hz) stimulation did not significantly modulate paired associative learning accuracy relative to the Null condition. → Zhijun Liao 2024 (2)
Evidence¶
Zhijun Liao 2024¶
Zhijun Liao, Xiya Ao, Yulu Sun, Manli Zhang & Xiangzhi Meng. (2024). Alpha sensory stimulation modulates theta phase during speech-print associative learning. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-024-00263-5
q3 · i? · causal · r1
Between-subjects experiment: 36 Chinese undergraduates were randomly assigned to a 10 Hz tone-flash entrainment condition and performed the PAL task; independent-samples t-test against the Null control group showed "t41 = −2.39, p = 0.021" with mean accuracy 0.95 vs 0.91. Only a t statistic was printed, so no effect size is reported here.
"First, α-rate sensory entrainment (M ± SD = 0.95 ± 0.03; t41 = −2.39, p = 0.021) significantly improved the response accuracy compared to the Nullcondition [0.91 ± 0.06]"
Zhijun Liao 2024 (2)¶
Zhijun Liao, Xiya Ao, Yulu Sun, Manli Zhang & Xiangzhi Meng. (2024). Alpha sensory stimulation modulates theta phase during speech-print associative learning. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-024-00263-5
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Same between-subjects PAL experiment: the 5 Hz theta stimulation group's accuracy (0.92 ± 0.08) did not differ from the Null condition, "t41 = 0.60, p = 0.595". A non-significant test with no printed effect size; equivalence was not tested.
"while θ-rate stimulation (0.92 ± 0.08;t41 = 0.60, p = 0.595) did not modulate the performance of associative learning (Fig. 1b)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Alpha-rate stimulation resets the phase of RT fluctuations at ~4 Hz and ~7 Hz during early exposure to congruent speech-print pairs, an effect absent at late consolidation, in incongruent trials, and under theta-rate stimulation — related
- Neither alpha- nor theta-rate stimulation induced a significant behavioral spectral peak at its own stimulation frequency in detrended RT series — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
alpha-stim-improves-speech-print-associative-learning |
title |
Alpha-rate (10 Hz) but not theta-rate (5 Hz) sensory stimulation improves accuracy of speech-print associative learning compared to a null-stimulation control |
description |
Alpha-rate (10 Hz) but not theta-rate (5 Hz) sensory stimulation improves accuracy of speech-print associative learning compared to a null-stimulation control |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2024 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — zhijun-liao-2024, zhijun-liao-2024-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.