Amotivation increased in both conditions during the intervention, but the increase was smaller in the need-supportive condition¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr2·q2·i1–i2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i2 Overall amotivation rose from pretest (M = 1.77, SD = 0.79) to posttest (M = 2.26, SD = 0.89), d = -0.524. → Louise Maddens 2023
q2 i1 The amotivation increase differed significantly between conditions, t(213) = 2.196, p = 0.029, d = 0.301, lower in the need-supportive group. → Louise Maddens 2023 (2)
Evidence¶
Louise Maddens 2023¶
Louise Maddens, Fien Depaepe, Annelies Raes, Jan Elen. (2023). Fostering students' motivation towards learning research skills: the role of autonomy, competence and relatedness support. Instructional Science 51, 165–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-022-09606-4
q2 · i2 · causal · r2
Paired samples t-test in the results: the rise was significant, t(214) = -7.69, p < 0.001, d = -0.524, an unexpected finding given SDT hypotheses.
"Overall, students' (n = 215) amotivation was higher on the posttest (M = 2.26, SD = 0.89) compared to the pretest (M = 1.77, SD = 0.79)"
Louise Maddens 2023 (2)¶
Louise Maddens, Fien Depaepe, Annelies Raes, Jan Elen. (2023). Fostering students' motivation towards learning research skills: the role of autonomy, competence and relatedness support. Instructional Science 51, 165–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-022-09606-4
q2 · i1 · causal · r2
Independent samples t-test on mean differences between the 97 baseline and 118 need-supportive students: the increase was 0.65 in baseline versus 0.37 in the need-supportive group, d = 0.301.
"the increases in amotivation [t(213) = 2.196, p = 0.029, d = 0.301] does differ significantly between the two conditions. More specifically, the increase was lower in the need supportive condition compared to the baseline condition."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Autonomous motivation decreased and controlled motivation increased overall, with no differences between the need-supportive and baseline conditions — related
- Both intervention conditions unexpectedly increased students' perceived cost relative to control — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
amotivation-increase-lower-need-support |
title |
Amotivation increased in both conditions during the intervention, but the increase was smaller in the need-supportive condition |
description |
Amotivation increased in both conditions during the intervention, but the increase was smaller in the need-supportive condition |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2023 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — louise-maddens-2023, louise-maddens-2023-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.