Claims

In the worked sample analysis of faculty professional development data, AMOVA yielded a final value of 3.00, a 'Proficient' level, leading to rejection of the null hypothesis

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoretical r1 · q1
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2018: local conditions change quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? A hypothetical sample dataset from an investigation into the efficacy of faculty training produced an accumulative AMOVA value of 3.00, indicating a Proficient level of instrumentation efficacy and acceptance of the alternative hypothesis. → Osler 2015

Evidence

Osler 2015

Osler, J. E. (2015). AMOVA ["Accumulative Manifold Validation Analysis"]: An advanced statistical methodology designed to measure and test the validity, reliability, and overall efficacy of inquiry-based psychometric instruments. i-manager's Journal of Educational Technology, 12(3). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1098595 doi:10.26634/jet.12.3.3742

q1 · i? · theoretical · r1

Sample data calculation with n and m = 11: the article reports 31 ÷ 11 = 2.818 ≅ 3.00 via the nearest-integer function, and states the null hypothesis "is rejected according to the final research outcomes that yielded a 3.00" while the alternative is accepted. The article labels the dataset hypothetical sample data.

"The data finally yielded a value of 3.00 = a "Proficient" Level of Accumulative Crosswise– Validation Analysis Instrumentation Efficacy."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id amova-sample-data-yields-proficient-300
title In the worked sample analysis of faculty professional development data, AMOVA yielded a final value of 3.00, a 'Proficient' level, leading to rejection of the null hypothesis
description In the worked sample analysis of faculty professional development data, AMOVA yielded a final value of 3.00, a 'Proficient' level, leading to rejection of the null hypothesis
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2015
recheck_by 2018
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-27
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — osler-2015

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.