Junior doctors apply anatomical knowledge throughout patient consultations, often without conscious awareness¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr3·q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2029: baselines and conditions change
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Junior doctors applied anatomical knowledge from practice-based learning throughout all phases of patient consultations, particularly during physical examination, and about half were not consciously aware of the visualisation process until the recall phase. → Albert Francis A. 2024
Evidence¶
Albert Francis A. 2024¶
Albert Francis A., Seidu Abdul-Aziz, Mason Hannah M., Anderson Emma, Alele Faith O., Heggarty Paula, Hollins Aaron, Gupta Tarun Sen, Hays Richard B., McArthur Lawrie, Malau-Aduli Bunmi S. (2024). A systematic review of medical practitioners' retention and application of basic sciences to clinical practice. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05952-8
q2 · i? · review · r3
The review reports this from one qualitative stimulated-recall study of 10 interns in the Netherlands examining anatomy knowledge and clinical reasoning; descriptive qualitative finding, no effect size.
"Junior doctors were observed to apply anatomical knowledge, acquired from practice-based learning, throughout all phases of patient consultations, particularly during physical examination."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.