Claims

The connective and is multifunctional in L1 essays, functioning as resultive and other relations, which may explain its lower frequency in L2 writing

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2020: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In L1 essays and functions as a multifunctional DC, including a pattern of and I think/feel/don't think/agree that/this occurring 85 times in ENS1, whereas L2 use of and mainly indicates an additive relationship. → Hu 2015

Evidence

Hu 2015

Hu, C., & Li, Y. (2015). Discourse Connectives in L1 and L2 Argumentative Writing. Higher Education Studies. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v5n4p30

q2 · i? · the article prints no effect size for this finding · associational · r2

Follow-up qualitative concordance analysis of and in the ENS1 sub-corpus (Section 4.2.1). The article argues and here functions as a resultive DC with a weaker degree than so, and that L2 writers prefer explicit devices like besides, moreover and in addition, which mark addition more explicitly and reduce reader effort.

"The concordance lines of and in ENS1 exhibit a clear pattern of and I think/feel/don’t think/agree that/this… , which occurs 85 times in ENS1, as demonstrated by (7). This pattern seldom appears in the L2 writes’ essays with few exceptions in Thailand students’ corpus."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id and-multifunctional-l1-essays
title The connective and is multifunctional in L1 essays, functioning as resultive and other relations, which may explain its lower frequency in L2 writing
description The connective and is multifunctional in L1 essays, functioning as resultive and other relations, which may explain its lower frequency in L2 writing
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2015
recheck_by 2020
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — hu-2015

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.