Claims

Angoff-derived cut-off scores exceeded the arbitrary 60% fixed passing mark, with one study reporting a 74.31% cut-off that would have produced a 41% failure rate

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Angoff cut-off scores were consistently higher than the commonly used arbitrary 60% benchmark, and a cut-off of 74.31% would have led to a 41% failure rate in an endodontic examination. → Lin Galvin Sim Siang 2026

Evidence

Lin Galvin Sim Siang 2026

Lin Galvin Sim Siang, Hisham Abdul Rauf Badrul, Majid Muhammad Nazmi Abdul, Foong Chan Choong, Ho Ting Khee, Friedlander Lara T. (2026). Refining competency benchmarks: a scoping review of Angoff standard-setting in dental education. BMC Oral Health. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-08195-9

q2 · i? · review · r2

The review reports from Yousef et al.'s retrospective studies of Saudi dental MCQ examinations that Angoff cut-offs were consistently higher than the fixed 60% passing score, and that "a cut-off score of 74.31% would have led to a 41% failure rate".

"Indeed, the Angoff method significantly affected student outcomes; for instance, a cut-off score of 74.31% would have led to a 41% failure rate in an endodontic examination [26]."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.