Claims

The animation advantage is larger when animation is coupled with auditory commentary

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q4 · i1 small
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q4 i1 Moderator analysis indicates a substantial effect size for animation over static graphics when the animation is coupled with auditory commentary (g = 0.336). → BERNEY 2016

Evidence

BERNEY 2016

BERNEY, Sandra, BETRANCOURT, Mireille. (2016). Does animation enhance learning? A meta-analysis. Computers and education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.06.005

q4 · i1 · quant-synthesis · r2

Moderator analysis within the random-effects meta-analysis of animated vs. static graphic comparisons. The review reports a substantial effect "when it was coupled with auditory commentary (g = 0.336)".

"Additional moderator analyses indicated substantial effect sizes when the animation was system-paced (g = 0.309), when it was coupled with auditory commentary (g = 0.336) or when the nstruction did not include any accompanying text (g = 0.883)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id animation-advantage-larger-auditory-commentary
title The animation advantage is larger when animation is coupled with auditory commentary
description The animation advantage is larger when animation is coupled with auditory commentary
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2016
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-15
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — berney-2016

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.