The animation advantage is larger when animation is coupled with auditory commentary¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr2·q4·i1small
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q4 i1 Moderator analysis indicates a substantial effect size for animation over static graphics when the animation is coupled with auditory commentary (g = 0.336). → BERNEY 2016
Evidence¶
BERNEY 2016¶
BERNEY, Sandra, BETRANCOURT, Mireille. (2016). Does animation enhance learning? A meta-analysis. Computers and education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.06.005
q4 · i1 · quant-synthesis · r2
Moderator analysis within the random-effects meta-analysis of animated vs. static graphic comparisons. The review reports a substantial effect "when it was coupled with auditory commentary (g = 0.336)".
"Additional moderator analyses indicated substantial effect sizes when the animation was system-paced (g = 0.309), when it was coupled with auditory commentary (g = 0.336) or when the nstruction did not include any accompanying text (g = 0.883)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Animation produces a small overall learning advantage over static graphics in multimedia instruction — a broader claim this one bears on
- The animation advantage is larger when the animation is system-paced — related
- The animation advantage is largest when instruction includes no accompanying text — related
- Presenting words as spoken narration rather than on-screen text alongside graphics improves learning — related
- Animation is overall beneficial to retention compared with static graphics in multimedia instruction about dynamic systems — a broader claim this one bears on
- Prior research failed to find clear evidence that animated graphics improve comprehension over static graphics — reports the opposite
- Voice-based multimedia settings (animation+voice and picture+voice) produce better learning performance than picture+text — related
- Dynamic visualizations show a small average benefit over static visualizations, with gender among the moderators — related
- Animations can be superior to static graphics for learning tasks involving human motor movement — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
animation-advantage-larger-auditory-commentary |
title |
The animation advantage is larger when animation is coupled with auditory commentary |
description |
The animation advantage is larger when animation is coupled with auditory commentary |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2016 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-15 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — berney-2016 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.