Claims

Computer animations produced more positive attitude gains toward science than Jigsaw II and reading-writing-presentation

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? ANCOVA of post-SLAS scores showed animation students developed significantly more positive attitudes toward science than both other groups. → Koç 2016

Evidence

Koç 2016

Koç, Y., Yildiz, E., Çaliklar, Ş., & Şimşek, Ü. (2016). Effect of Jigsaw II, reading-writing-presentation, and computer animations on the teaching of “Light” Unit. Educational Research and Reviews. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2016.2861

q2 · i? · causal · r1

ANCOVA on post-SLAS scores covarying pre-SLAS showed a significant group effect [F(2,67)=16.475; p<0.05]. LSD tests favored the animation group over both Jigsaw II and reading-writing-presentation groups.

"The relevant results show that more statistically significant positive developments occurred in the attitudes of the AG students towards the science lesson compared to both the JIIG students and RWPG students."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.