First-year (1995) Challenge grantmaking concentrated on networks with higher-education and community-based partners, which received most grants and dollars¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · qualitativer3·q2
Currency · newest study 1999 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2002: local conditions change quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? In the 1995 funding cycle, higher-education or community-based partners submitted 85 percent of funded proposals, and higher-education institutions alone received 49 percent of requested grants, 46 percent of grants, and 57 percent of dollars allocated. → Dorothy Shipps 1999
q2 i? Networks with business, labor, foundation, and government external partners received only 14 percent of 1995 grants and 7 percent of dollars, with 66 percent of their proposals rejected. → Dorothy Shipps 1999 (2)
Evidence¶
Dorothy Shipps 1999¶
Dorothy Shipps, Karin Sconzert, with Holly Swyers. (1999). The Chicago Annenberg Challenge: The First Three Years. Consortium on Chicago School Research. https://consortium.uchicago.edu/publications/chicago-annenberg-challenge-first-three-years
q2 · i? · qualitative · r3
Tabulation of Chicago Challenge grant records cross-tabulated against school descriptive data for the 1995 cycle. The authors report that "85 percent of the funded pro- posals" came from higher-education or community-based partners; they also print that higher-education institutions' funded share was 49 percent of requests and 57 percent of dollars.
"Higher education or community-based partners submitted 85 percent of the funded pro- posals, and all but one of the first-year implementation grants had such partners."
Dorothy Shipps 1999 (2)¶
Dorothy Shipps, Karin Sconzert, with Holly Swyers. (1999). The Chicago Annenberg Challenge: The First Three Years. Consortium on Chicago School Research. https://consortium.uchicago.edu/publications/chicago-annenberg-challenge-first-three-years
q2 · i? · qualitative · r3
Same grant-record analysis of the 1995 cycle. The authors report business, labor, foundation, and government partner networks received "only 14 percent of the grants and 7 per- cent of the dollars awarded in 1995," with 66 percent of such proposals rejected.
"At the other end of the spectrum, networks with external partners from the business, labor, foun- dation, and government sectors (including CPS and federally funded organizations) together re- ceived only 14 percent of the grants and 7 per- cent of the dollars awarded in 1995. Sixty-six percent of the proposals from networks with external partners in these sectors were rejected."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Chicago Annenberg Challenge schools enrolled about 220 schools and 42 percent of CPS students, with demographics largely representative of the system — related
- The Chicago Annenberg Challenge underwent rapid organizational learning, reshaping from a community-organizing collaborative into a formal activist foundation — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
annenberg-1995-grantmaking-higher-education-concentration |
title |
First-year (1995) Challenge grantmaking concentrated on networks with higher-education and community-based partners, which received most grants and dollars |
description |
First-year (1995) Challenge grantmaking concentrated on networks with higher-education and community-based partners, which received most grants and dollars |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
1999 |
recheck_by |
2002 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — dorothy-shipps-1999, dorothy-shipps-1999-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.