Claims

Literary appreciation is hardly attainable as a by-product of formal language-training instruction

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 1921 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The study demonstrates that literary appreciation is another matter, hardly attainable as a by-product of formal language-training instruction using high-literary-value material. → L. Z 1921

Evidence

L. Z 1921

L. Z. (1921). New Publications: Review of Empirical Studies in School Reading. The Journal of Educational Psychology. https://eric.ed.gov/?q=Empirical+Studies+in+School+Reading

q2 · i? · review · r1

The review reports this as demonstrated by verbatim reports of experimental lessons and experimental evaluation of methods and devices, against advocates who used high-literary-value material for formal language training.

"That literary appreciation is another matter, hardly attainable as a by-product of such in-struction is clearly demonstrated by the verbatim reports of experimental lessons and the experimental evaluation of methods and devices."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id appreciation-not-byproduct-of-formal-instruction
title Literary appreciation is hardly attainable as a by-product of formal language-training instruction
description Literary appreciation is hardly attainable as a by-product of formal language-training instruction
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 1921
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-24
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — l-z-1921

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.