Augmented reality applications in education have a medium positive average effect (ES=0.677) on student outcomes according to a random effects meta-analysis¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? The combined effect size of AR applications in education across 15 studies was ES=0.677 (95% CI 0.491–0.863, p=.000), a medium effect under the Thalheimer and Cook classification. → Hakan Tekedere 2016

Evidence¶

Hakan Tekedere 2016¶

Hakan Tekedere, Hanife Göker. (2016). Examining the Effectiveness of Augmented Reality Applications in Education: A Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 11(16), 9469-9481. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Meta-analysis of 15 SCI/SSCI-indexed studies (2005–2015) with a combined sample of 1560, combined under a random effects model. The article reports "the effect size was ES=0.677" with SE 0.095 and p=.000, which falls in the 0.40–0.75 medium band of the Thalheimer and Cook classification.

"the data obtained in the 15 studies that were included in the meta-analysis showed according to random effects model that the standard error was 0.095, the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval was 0.863 and the lower limit was 0.491; and the effect size was ES=0.677"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Effect size distributions across AR-in-education studies were heterogeneous (Q=35.692, I²=60.776%), requiring a random effects model — related
• SCI/SSCI-indexed publications on AR in education increased in recent years, concentrated in Computers & Education (21 of 171 studies) — related
• Individual study effect sizes range from -0.07 to 3.35, with most classified as moderate to amazing effects — related