Individual study effect sizes for AR in education ranged from 0.116 to 1.968 in favor of the study groups, with 11 of 15 studies statistically significant¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? All 15 included studies showed positive effect sizes between 0.116 and 1.968 (Hedges's g) favoring the study groups; significance at p<.05 was found in 11 studies while no differences were determined in 4 studies. → Hakan Tekedere 2016

Evidence¶

Hakan Tekedere 2016¶

Hakan Tekedere, Hanife Göker. (2016). Examining the Effectiveness of Augmented Reality Applications in Education: A Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 11(16), 9469-9481. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Uncombined effect sizes reported in Table 3 and the forest plot (Figure 2) for the 15 included studies. The article reports "The effect size calculated being positive was determined between 0.116 and 1.968" and states statistical significance (p<.05) in 11 studies, with no differences in 4 studies.

"The effect size calculated being positive was determined between 0.116 and 1.968 (according to Hedges’s g). The effect size being positive shows that the values are in favor of the Study Groups in the studies conducted on the use of AR technology in education."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Most individual studies favor posttest over pretest: 24 of 31 show statistically significant gains and 28 of 31 favor posttest — related
• Individual study effect sizes ranged from 0.010 to 2.031, with two studies exceeding 2.00, and the forest plot shows a difference greater than zero in favour of the experimental group — related