Claims

Each of the four ARCS motivational components (attention, relevance, confidence, satisfaction) was rated significantly higher in the e-learning group

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? All four ARCS component scores were significantly higher in the experimental group, e.g. attention 33.58±4.88 vs. 24.7±2.29 and satisfaction 50.17±7.34 vs. 40.86±2.71 (each p = 0.001). → Omrani 2012

Evidence

Omrani 2012

Omrani, S., Fardanesh, H., Hemmati, N., & Hemmati, N. (2012). Exploring an appropriate instructional design model for continuing medical education. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 13(3). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ997826

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Table 3 reports the four motivational components separately for control and experimental groups, each with t and p = 0.001, showing higher ratings on every ARCS component in the e-learning group.

"attention 24.7±2.29 33.58±4.88 9.015 0.001 relevance 30.76±1.04 39.80±6.47 7.544 0.001 confidence 29.76 ±2.17 37.10±5.05 7.30 0.001 satisfaction 40.86±2.71 50.17±7.34 6.51 0.001"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.