Claims

Participating in argumentation-based lessons increases students' willingness for argumentation

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Experiment group students' Argumentation Willingness Scale scores rose significantly from pretest (mean 73.90) to posttest (mean 79.53). → Emel Mercan 2017

Evidence

Emel Mercan 2017

Emel Mercan, Tevfik İşleyen. (2017). Analyzing the Efficiency of Argumentation Based Practices on 9th Grade Functions Subject. Universal Journal of Educational Research 5(7). https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.050716

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Dependent t-test on AWS scores of the 30 experiment-group students, whose score distributions were normal; the article reports the difference "is on behalf of the posttest". AWS was implemented only to the experiment group.

"there is a significant difference between AWS pretest (𝑋=73.90) and AWS posttest (𝑋=79.53) score averages of experiment group (t(29)=-3.741; p<.05)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.