Claims

ARPS scores are positively and significantly correlated with all four RIMMS motivation dimensions

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2028: tool and model accuracy changes quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i3 ARPS correlates positively with attention, relevance, confidence, and satisfaction as measured by RIMMS, with Pearson r values of .646, .614, .616, and .608 respectively (all p < .001). → Enrico Gandolfi · Richard E. Ferdig 2025

Evidence

Enrico Gandolfi · Richard E. Ferdig 2025

Enrico Gandolfi · Richard E. Ferdig. (2025). Exploring the relationship between motivation and augmented reality presence using the augmented reality presence scale (ARPS). Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-025-10446-5

q2 · i3 · associational · r1

Pearson correlation analysis of ARPS and RIMMS scores from the same 90-participant study; Table 5 prints effect sizes r = .646 (attention), r = .614 (relevance), r = .616 (confidence), r = .608 (satisfaction), all Sig. (2-tailed) < .001. Post hoc power exceeded 0.93.

"Correlations were found to be significant and positive for all the four RIMMS subfactors (see Table 5). A post hoc power analysis of the correlation coefficient, using an alpha level of 0.05, yielded a statistical power of over 0.93."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.