Claims

The ASD-risk subsample differed from the non-identified sample on all parent-reported baseline outcomes but on only one teacher-reported measure (SSiS Empathy)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The identified (n = 34) and non-identified (n = 92) samples did not differ significantly on teacher-reported measures except a significantly lower SSiS Empathy score for the subsample, but differed significantly on all parent-reported outcomes. → Frey 2015

Evidence

Frey 2015

Frey, A. J., Small, J. W., Feil, E. G., Seeley, J. R., Walker, H. M., & Forness, S. (2015). First Step to Success: Applications to Preschoolers at Risk of Developing Autism Spectrum Disorders. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 50(4), 397–407. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1082560

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Baseline comparison (Table 1) of the 34 children identified as at risk for ASD against the 92 non-identified children from the original trial. Parent-reported differences were expected since the subsample was identified using parent-reported ECI data; teacher-reported SSiS Empathy showed t = 2.19, p = .030.

"The two samples did not differ significantly on any of the teacher-reported outcome measures with the exception of a significantly lower SSiS Empathy score for the subsample."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.