Included reports are methodologically robust overall but weak on implementation fidelity, which was assessed in only about half of the programs¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? Using CEC (2014) quality indicators, most reports described and contextualized the intervention and provided adequate analyses, but fidelity indicators (adherence and dosage) were the main weak points. → Sara Berti 2023

Evidence¶

Sara Berti 2023¶

Sara Berti, Valentina Grazia, Luisa Molinari. (2023). Active Student Participation in Whole-School Interventions in Secondary School. A Systematic Literature Review. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09773-x

q3 · i? · review · r2

Methodological quality assessment of the included reports against Council for Exceptional Children (2014) indicators, with three independent researchers rating each report (Tables 3 and 4). Most studies were strong in contextualizing research, describing the program, and conducting quality analyses; fidelity indicators 4 and 5 were the weak points.

"we found a weakness concerning the fidelity of implementation, as this indicator was observed in only about half of the considered programs."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• PBIS effects on collegial leadership and institutional integrity were significant only when implementation fidelity was included in the model — related
• Personalized Learning Effects Vary With Fidelity — related
• The active-learning advantage is robust to publication bias and to variation in methodological rigor of the included studies — related