Claims

Teacher time imposes no incremental cost for ASSISTments above business-as-usual instruction

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Despite significant differences in time on homework practices and planning, aggregated teacher time showed no incremental cost of ASSISTments above business-as-usual instruction. → Feng 2024

Evidence

Feng 2024

Feng, M., Weiser, G., & Collins, K. (2024). Cost and cost effectiveness of ASSISTments online math support: Analysis from a randomized controlled study in middle school. WestEd. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED655721

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Analysis of teachers' implementation logs and a postimplementation survey measuring self-reported instructional behavior. The report concludes "there is no incremental cost of teacher time for ASSISTments above business-as-usual instruction," reflected as negative teacher opportunity cost in Table 1.

"Statistically significant differences were observed in the amount of time dedicated to homework practices in the classroom and in planning time to support instruction."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id assistments-no-incremental-teacher-time-cost
title Teacher time imposes no incremental cost for ASSISTments above business-as-usual instruction
description Teacher time imposes no incremental cost for ASSISTments above business-as-usual instruction
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2024
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — feng-2024

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.