Within-student transitions are asymmetric: 18.9% of consistent individual users stop using LLMs in teams while only 3.2% start, with framing shifts concentrated in movement to non-use¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Of 95 students, 18 (18.9%) who consistently used LLMs on individual assignments stopped in teams; only 3 (3.2%) moved the opposite way (Wilcoxon signed-rank W = 254.0, p < .0001). → Sehrish Basir Nizamani 2026
Evidence¶
Sehrish Basir Nizamani 2026¶
Sehrish Basir Nizamani, Zannah Ziew, Saad Nizamani, and Khyati Goyal. (2026). Less Deliberate in Teams: Student LLM Use Across Individual and Collaborative Work. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.30860 doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.30860
q2 · i? · associational · r1
Within-student transition analysis classifying each of 95 students by dominant HW and TP usage pattern; the quote reports the 18.9% and 3.2% transition rates. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test confirmed the asymmetry (W = 254.0, p < .0001); no standardized effect size is printed.
"However, 18 students (18.9%) who consistently used LLMs across individual assignments stopped using them when working in teams. Only 3 students (3.2%) moved in the opposite direction."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Role framing shifts toward non-use in team contexts, with non-use more than doubling — related
- Prompting technique distribution shifts in teams, driven by students reporting no technique at all — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
asymmetric-within-student-llm-disengagement-in-teams |
title |
Within-student transitions are asymmetric: 18.9% of consistent individual users stop using LLMs in teams while only 3.2% start, with framing shifts concentrated in movement to non-use |
description |
Within-student transitions are asymmetric: 18.9% of consistent individual users stop using LLMs in teams while only 3.2% start, with framing shifts concentrated in movement to non-use |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-11 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — sehrish-basir-nizamani-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.