AT research on students with disabilities is concentrated in the USA and dominated by qualitative designs and secondary education settings¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? 58.06% of the reviewed studies are qualitative, 38.71% quantitative and 3.23% mixed; secondary education is the most studied level (41.94%). → José María Fernández-Batanero 2022

Evidence¶

José María Fernández-Batanero 2022¶

José María Fernández-Batanero, Marta Montenegro-Rueda, José Fernández-Cerero, Inmaculada García-Martínez. (2022). Assistive technology for the inclusion of students with disabilities: a systematic review. Educational technology research and development, 70, 1911–1930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10127-7

q2 · i? · review · r2

The overview reports the methodological distribution of included studies: "58.06% of the studies are conducted qualitatively". Secondary education accounts for 41.94% of studies and primary education 38.71%. Descriptive, no effect sizes.

"These data indicate that, in terms of study design, 58.06% of the studies are conducted qualitatively. Quantitative studies are less common (38.71%), while only one study reviewed is classified as mixed (3.23%)"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Research on generative AI in secondary STEM education is concentrated in the Global North, with 73% of affiliations and the United States accounting for 30% of publications — related
• Deployments concentrate in special education areas and primary/secondary institutions, with the USA leading country counts — related